Skip to main content

The Current Catholic Quagmire

The Catholic Church is at least putatively an organization oriented toward forgiveness, healing, and reconciliation. In fact, Paul tells his readers that his ministry is specifically one of reconciliation - between Man and God, and between all persons. Paul will also tell us that he doesn’t quite understand why disciples go to court with disciples - surely the body of Christ has the wherewithal to discern justice within its members. The entire rite of penance is to correct and restore rather than punish wrongdoing, and that within an atmosphere of confidentiality and grace. Your priest, after all, isn’t supposed to publish your transgressions in next week’s parish newsletter or assign you inhumane or even harsh penance. This is intended to communicate God’s and our acceptance of imperfect humans as our brothers and sisters, and to restore them to right standing with God and the community. Christian discipline isn’t intended to punish but rehabilitate. It is understandable then, at least to me how the Church began to get itself into this current quagmire. 

The problem comes when we develop what Francis referred to as clericalism - a system in which some are seen as privileged because of their office. In deference to the cleric, laypersons or even other clerics in less powerful positions are taken advantage of and abused in various ways without effective recourse within the People of God. It is one thing to discipline a cleric quietly for debased behavior; it is quite another, however, to deny the offense and cause the injured person to be on the defensive. It is exponentially more horrendous to allow such a cleric to continue their behavior seemingly unchecked.

I am not against transferring clerics to New Mexico for rehabilitation, removing them from their parishes and positions of authority, to a place under the control of other, circumspect clerics in lives of prayer and penance for themselves and the world. I am not even against letting them leave New Mexico, to return to communities closer to their homes and loved ones - again under the authority of circumspect clerics exercising close supervision. 

The current situation is sad and disappointing, and maddening because it did not have to be. Everything that has come to light has been the result of some form of clericalism - official and social privilege that emboldens and blinds those in power and disempowers the unprivileged or less-empowered. Church discipline as envisioned by Paul is not intended to turn a blind eye or to ignore ongoing debased behavior - or any unChristian behavior for that matter. Grace and mercy are to be our primary concerns toward others but they exist to allow for correction and rehabilitation of even the greatest sins. To that end, they must be accompanied by that correction and intentional rehabilitation; not in their absence.

And this is the failure; a failure of correction and rehabilitation of those who like the rest of us, live imperfect and often persistently imperfect lives. The calls for resignations and punishment arise when the People of God perceive that their leaders are culpable for not reflecting the leadership of Christ. While many calls for resignations and defrocking are based in anger and a desire for punishment, they should not be so based. Rather, resignations and defrocking should serve two pastoral purposes: first is the protection of the People of God from immature and self-centered leaders; the peace of the community which cannot be maintained in an environment of clerical abuse and institutionalism; and the unity of the church which is destroyed by those who think they are above accusation and correction. Second is the desired correction and rehabilitation of those who have so grievously taken advantage of those over whom they have had responsibility and power. This is not to be based in hate or “to seek (punitive) justice” but to heal, and restore; to reconcile the People of God and her members to one another, and to the world.

The Church cannot control what temporal authorities might do, but she can and must ensure that her spiritual life is reflective of love for all concerned. It is this love, our highest calling that results in both healing for the injured and correction and rehabilitation for those responsible for committing and allowing the sin to continue seemingly unabated for eons.

This is a sad season for the Church but it can also be a season of renewal - it must be a season of renewal if her witness to the world and her embodiment of her God are to be taken seriously and be effective for her calling.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Passover, The First Born, Abraham, and You

Israel has been in captivity in Egypt, Moses has completed his contests with Pharaoh, and the People of Israel have been expelled from Egypt. The death of Egyptian firstborn children and livestock has compelled their removal into the wilderness. At the end of Exodus 12, God institutes the Passover in remembrance of the Angel of Death passing by the homes of Jews on the night the Egyptian firstborn children were killed. Notably, they were spared if in a house with blood around the door.  The Passover is established for Israel herself, including their slaves who have been circumcised. If a sojourner wants to celebrate the Passover with you, he can after he circumcises all males with him. I suspect that pretty much eliminated any visitors participating. In chapter 13, the protocols include redeeming Israel's firstborn. In this discussion, God says your firstborn belongs to God, and you must redeem your firstborn or you must kill it. God has redeemed Israel's firstborn by the blood...

Wineskins II

       In chapter 16 of Matthew, Peter ‘makes the great confession’ - Jesus he says is the Son of the Living God. At Covenant, when someone wants to become a member or to be baptized, we ask them who Jesus is and we expect this response. Peter is correct when he says this, but it is not clear that Peter (or the other disciples) understood the ramifications of his statement. Following Peter’s statement we find a series of incidents that make us wonder just how much Peters actually believed what he had said.      In the first instance, Jesus compares Peter to Satan. Jesus tells his disciples that he is going to Jerusalem and there he will die. Peter exclaims that he will not let that happen; Jesus will not be killed. Peter is expecting great things from Jesus as the Messiah, the Son of God on behalf of Israel and he cannot fit Jesus dying into his hope for a greater Israel under this Messiah. This cannot happen, he reasons. Jesus’s response is a harsh re...

Faith to Faith

"For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith for faith, as it is written, "The righteous shall live by faith." (Romans 1.16-17, ESV) There are various renderings and understandings of the phrase as it is used here, "faith for faith." Both words for faith derive from pistis, with the first being pisteos (genitive) and the second, pistin (accusative) . Faith, we are told, begins in faith and leads to faith. The import of this origin and fulfillment is found in the next sentence above, the righteous shall live by faith (genitive). We might word this as "already held or possessed faith will result in or lead to faith. As it is written, the one who has faith will parlay that faith into a salvific faith. Faith held by the believer will lead the believer to greater or more complete faith, resulting in her s...