Skip to main content

Cross Bearing

Jesus has said two seemingly contradictory observations. The first in that his yoke is easy. The second, pick up your cross and follow me.

Hmmm...

That whole cross thing doesn’t seem to be something light, does it? I mean, the beating, the embarrassment, the struggling with its physical weight or too, its psychological weight, the crucifixion and mocking, while being nailed to it. Nope, definitely not light. Even so, this carrying one’s cross is seemingly expected of Jesus’s followers.

Man is not by nature inclined to carry the cross, to love the cross, to chasten the body, and bring it  into subjection....Resolve then, as a good and faithful servant of Christ, manfully to bear the cross of your Lord, who was crucified for love of you....Be assured of this, that you must live a dying life. And the more completely a man dies to self, the more he begins to live to God. [1]

This cross we bear has been described in various ways through the centuries including perhaps most importantly, being disparaged or lied about, or for being a disciple of God. More recently, the cross has been defined as the hard parts of life including extended caregiving of a disabled partner and I suppose all these could be included. But are these what Jesus meant?

Maybe.

Let’s look at Jesus before settling on an answer. What was Jesus’ cross? It was nothing less than emptying himself for the purpose of doing the Father’s will. He was insulted, beaten, and killed not for healing people per se, not for raising the dead per se. Those are not crosses. Well, they're not the cross we’re looking for. No, he was killed for nothing more than being faithful to God. In fact, his death was an example of his desire to do “your will, not mine.” His cross was emptying himself not just of God-privilege, but of ego in relation to the work, the life of God on earth. It is the emptying and denial of self in deference to the desires of God that is our cross.

Our cross may involve being fed to the lions, or drowned in a cage by Isis, but it doesn’t need to be. It might include years of care-giving for a disabled and cantankerous partner, but it doesn’t need to. It may be not being promoted or even being fired for holding certain beliefs and principles, but it doesn’t need to. The hardest thing it seems for us humans to do is to set ourselves aside in our faithful following of God – for whatever reason. This is what makes caring for that cantankerous invalid our cross. It isn’t the difficulty of the thing; the endless duration of the thing; the persistent exhaustion of the thing. It is the inherent denial of ourselves that is our cross.

The thing we are called to do, to endure, to die from gains its worth from our emptying, our denial of our egos, and our too often desires to please ourselves. It is in becoming the image or the icon of God as lived in the life of Jesus that we carry our cross. So the cross we are called to bear is our own dying life as we – in whatever circumstance – empty ourselves for others as our God does for others and the world.

When Jesus says, pick up your cross and follow me, the cross to which he refers is you and me – ourselves. The good news? That once we die to ourselves we come to life, real life. But that’s for another time.

How can you; how do you need to die to yourself this week?

[1] a Kempis, T. (2004). The Inner Life, Shereley-Price, tr. New York: Penguin
Photo by Halanna Halila on Unsplash

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Obedience Rather Than Sacrifice

Saul it seems, was instructed to have the Israelite completely destroy the Amalekites – people and animals. Rather, Saul allowed the Israelites to capture the Amalekite king, and to bring back the choicest live stock. When Samuel returns to visit Saul, the bleating of the sheep and the lowing of the cattle are clearly audible. Assuming that the Israelites had done what had been directed, Samuel finds this noise to be somewhat unexpected, and so he asks Saul to explain what has happened. Saul’s response is a two-parter. The first is that the people have brought back the best of the plunder to sacrifice it to God. The second is that Saul was afraid of the people and so he let them bring back the plunder [and in this explanation, we don’t know why]. Samuel’s response is his mission for God, and he will complete it. Samuel tells Saul that he has failed in his mission to destroy the Amalekites and as a result God has rejected him as king of Israel. In Samuel’s discussion with Saul, he says:

Elders redux

A reader (I am always amazed that people actually read this blog) submitted a rather long comment on the original post on Elders. It is apparent that the reader did some good homework as the comment has several, well, more than several, reference citations. It is clear that they both read the original post and did some Bible study before posting their comment. Because the comment was so long, I thought it appropriate to post another entry rather than bury the response in the comment log. In the following discussion, I have included the text of the comment without the Scripture references. If you want to read the comment in its entirety, scroll to the Elders post and click on the comment. --------------------------------------------------------- [Comment~~~~The church is expected to be a people in exactly this sense. We are the people of God who are charged with continuing and preserving the values, culture, hopes, and the identity of God’s people in our time.~~~~ Does this include th

Naaman's Dipping and Requests

The familiar story of Naaman dipping in the Jordan is a story with more than a few twists. Let's review the story first. Naaman we are told had been used by YHWH to punish Israel and our story describes him as a man of valor in high regard by his boss, the King of Syria the current thorn in the side of Israel. It turns out though that Naaman suffers from some sort of leprosy.  On one of Syria's raids into Israel, the Syrians captured an Jewish girl who had found her way into Naaman's household as a servant for his wife. Knowing of Naaman's illness, she suggests to her matron that there is a prophet in Israel who could help him. This message gets transmitted to Naaman who takes it to his boss. The boss - the king of Syria, tells Naaman to travel to Israel and gives him a letter to Israel's king directing that Naaman be healed. Upon Naaman's arrival in Israel he gives the letter to Israel's king who reacts in a panic. He does not even consider finding t