Skip to main content

The Word Became Flesh

John's writings have common threads whether we speak about his epistles or his gospel. Certainly, one of those is love - the love of God for the world, and the expected reciprocal love of God by people. Perhaps the most famous of his statements is that God so loved the world that He gave His only Son for the world to save it. But there is another thread common among his writings but it is not overly explicit. That is a corrective narrative against what appears to be the beginnings of what would become what we call Gnosticism. Specifically, a dualistic view of Creation.

This view, arising from Greek influences argued that the physical world was corrupt and imperfect; destined for destruction. On the other hand, this view held that the spiritual life, or that of the mind was that which was to be perfected and leave the coarse physical reality behind. This view infiltrated the church such that some would teach that what we did in or with our bodies was of no consequence. Our bodies would die and decay and were inherently not good, but corrupt. Because of this, disciples could participate in any number of illicit and sinful behaviors because it wouldn't matter. What would matter is their understanding and acceptance of Jesus. These beliefs about Jesus would perfect their minds, the important aspect of humans and this is what would cause them to be accepted by God. The affect then was that as long as you believed the right precepts, you could conduct your physical life in any way you'd like. John is not the only writer with this concern; it is actually quite common throughout the New Testament.

A correlate of this dualistic view of physical and spiritual being was voiced as an objection to Jesus having been really and actually Deity incarnate. Since Jesus was flesh and God is spirit; because flesh was inherently bad and spirit good, Jesus could not have been Deity incarnate. He only appeared to have a body, or his body was real but his mind had been taken over by the spirit of God. However we might slice it, the argument would have gone, Jesus of Nazareth with his physical body was not God.

This view of dualism is in the background of John's writings, and he wastes no time denouncing it in his Gospel. We are told up front that from the very beginning, the Word was with God and the Word was God. John will not hold any punches with this topic. He declares that this Word was Deity.

Later in this reading John will tell us that this Word became flesh and lived among us; that he had seen Him and could witness to Him. This enfleshed Word John will identify as Jesus in a few paragraphs. His point - that Jesus of Nazareth was this Divine Word who took on flesh and lived on the earth. For John, there is no question. He will tell us in chapter 20 that he writes his gospel so that we will believe that Jesus is this Divine Word that existed from the beginning of time. For John, dualism doesn't exist; physical flesh and spiritual Divinity in fact coexisted as one person.

We find also in this passage that this Word was both life and light. Life we are told because through Him all things have been made.He is life because He is Life itself. He gives and He sustains our lives. It is this Life that became flesh and walked among us. And yet not even His own people recognized or received Him. The very Life of the entire Creation was also the Light for all people. Light as a guide; Light as something that reveals reality; Light as something that shows forth. The Word was this Light and those who had their eyes open and their hearts not seared saw this Light and came to it. The Light illumines the truth that the life He lived among us illustrated and modeled the Life that He is and that He offered.

Those who received Him, who saw the Light and who saw the Life for what it is, these He welcomed into the kingdom of God as children of the Father. John says this becoming children was not dependent on physical descent, but on belief that this enfleshed Word was indeed Life and Light This sort of belief is not simple acknowledgement; not simply a mental conclusion. No, this belief is often better described as trust. Trust that throws all in with God and joins Him in Life and work. This joining is such that God's desires and values become our desires and values. We come to understand and to own these for ourselves. Often we hear an allusion to disciples "reflecting" God to those around them. It seems to me that this does not quite meet the parallel. Rather it is that disciples are to be more like glow in the dark material. We live in the Light so that we absorb its energy and it becomes our own. When we turn off the light, we glow from within ourselves, emitting that energy and Light that we have absorbed as our own. We never become the Light, but the real Light we emit is our own.

These ideas are important for John as he both argues that Jesus is the Word and that we come to Him through trust that His way of Life is really for us. The Life He led allowed Him to say that if His disciples had seen Him, they had seen the Father. There was no distinction necessary between Jesus in the flesh, and the Divine Word. Similarly, John argues the same for disciples. We are both flesh and Spirit and this informs our ways of life. It rules out immoral living while holding to Spiritual truths. The two go hand in hand for John. 

This Life; this Creator God came to live among us. 

Really.

If we perceive the Light and receive it and join it in trust, we are children of God; both flesh and Spirit.

Really.

Live into the Life and Light of God, and glow with a minor light which becomes your own.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wineskins II

       In chapter 16 of Matthew, Peter ‘makes the great confession’ - Jesus he says is the Son of the Living God. At Covenant, when someone wants to become a member or to be baptized, we ask them who Jesus is and we expect this response. Peter is correct when he says this, but it is not clear that Peter (or the other disciples) understood the ramifications of his statement. Following Peter’s statement we find a series of incidents that make us wonder just how much Peters actually believed what he had said.      In the first instance, Jesus compares Peter to Satan. Jesus tells his disciples that he is going to Jerusalem and there he will die. Peter exclaims that he will not let that happen; Jesus will not be killed. Peter is expecting great things from Jesus as the Messiah, the Son of God on behalf of Israel and he cannot fit Jesus dying into his hope for a greater Israel under this Messiah. This cannot happen, he reasons. Jesus’s response is a harsh re...

Freewheeling

Merton never disappoints. Here's an excerpt from "Love and Living," a collection of individual writings collected after his death in 1968: "Life consists in learning to live on one's own, spontaneous, freewheeling; to do this one must recognize what is one's own—be familiar and at home with oneself. This means basically learning who one is, and learning what one has to offer to the contemporary world, and then learning how to make that offering valid." This short passage is pregnant with meaning and spiritual insight (would we expect anything less?). Let's start with the last few words: "…make that offering valid." The offering of ourselves, of our lives is our calling. We offer ourselves to assist the re-creation of Creation; the reconciling of Man to God. The validity of our offering is measured in how closely we mirror the work of God; to what extent our motivations are based on knowing who we are rather than a slavish obedience to p...

Wineskins

  Jesus comes from the Wilderness where the Spirit has driven him for testing, announcing the imminent coming of the Kingdom of Heaven. His message to the crowds calls them to repent because the “Kingdom is at hand.” The kingdom or the effective rule of God has come upon Israel and Israel’s expected response is to return to her God. A number of passages tell us the sorts of things God has against Israel or at least her leaders. They have the form of the People of God, but not the substance. He will call those opposed to him “white-washed tombs” to describe their religious and moral corruption. They look good but are dead. He calls these people to repentance, to return to “their first love,” to actually live as though they are the People of God. In another place, he will tell them that while they do well to tithe mint and cumin, they have missed the larger point of caring for people. In the judgment scene, he describes sending into a place of gnashing of teeth those who failed to gi...