Skip to main content

Blogging Matthew - 11.4-5

“Go and tell John what you hear and see.”

John has sent his disciples to find out if Jesus is Messiah, the one Israel has been awaiting. You see, John’s in prison and his world doesn’t seem to be working for him lately. He’s been out in the wilderness eating honey and bugs, preaching and arguing with self-righteous Jews, and pretty much getting his legs and feet water logged. More recently though, he’s been arrested and is sitting in Herod’s prison, and he won’t get out alive. Maybe he knows that, maybe he doesn’t. I suspect though, that he’d exchange the cell for water logged feet without much coercion. 

Jesus doesn’t answer John’s disciples directly. Instead, he talks around the answer, expecting them to draw their own conclusion based on what has been going on. These signs, he says, that I’ve been doing – healing folks, restoring sight, raising the dead – what do they tell you? 

Keep in mind that John is Jesus’ cousin, that John baptized him and presumably heard The Voice and saw the dove. John has even told others that Jesus is the one who was promised; that John wasn’t worthy to untie Jesus’ sandals.

And the answer he gets is essentially, “what do you think?”

This response isn’t unique toward John. Jesus uses essentially the same response or even the same question with his challengers and even his own disciples. When asked for a sign, Jesus’ response is that there will be no sign except that of Jonah. When pressed in another place, he tells his hearers that they can tell the times of the year, but they can’t read the signs of God right in front of them.  Instead of telling his disciples who he is, he asks, “Who do the people say I am,” and “Who do you say that I am?”

He seems to think his identity should be obvious to people who have their eyes open. If they’ve been paying attention it should be relatively obvious who he is. But it’s not as though they don’t see what’s happening. Even John’s disciples are told to consider what they’ve seen and heard. Rather, in keeping with the oft stated admonition, “let him who has ears, hear,” or negatively, “having eyes, they do not see,.” Jesus avoids a direct answer and puts the question back on the inquirer.

The point of these sayings is that we do see what’s going on, but we fail to comprehend what is happening; the import of what we see. We see Jesus, but do we see Messiah? Do we see God? Do we see the salvation of the world in the kept promises of God?

This is our challenge as much as it was John’s. Do our eyes show us, do our ears bring to us the revelation of God’s presence in the world? Do we have the ability, the practice, to discern God in his creation and in our world? Do we see him in our lives?

If we become discouraged and wonder if God is really there, we often want a clear answer. A good, tight, physical hug would help too. What do or will we do if we get an answer similar to the one John received? Can we see God in the middle of our hurried and anxious lives, or do we miss him and wonder if this is all real?

What has been your experience?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

He Remembers We Are But Flesh

In Job, often considered the first book written in the Bible, we are introduced to the accuser. In the introduction to the book, it is the accuser who accuses Job of being righteous and faithful to God only because of the blessings that God has given Job. We find the accuser again in Zechariah 3. The High Priest Joshua is standing in front of the Lord in filthy clothes, and the accuser is making accusations. The Lord rebukes the accuser and then says that he will cleanse Joshua.  Then in the New Testament, we see the appearance of the Advocate. The Spirit, we are told, is sent to walk beside us, to be a witness, to be an advocate for us. The accuser challenges us, questions our faithfulness, and questions our integrity as people who are supposed to follow God as His people, His disciples. This is an entre for being blamed and shamed. But God comes alongside us and advocates for us. We are told too that Jesus is our mediator with God. Jesus defends us and explains us to God so that ...

Elders redux

A reader (I am always amazed that people actually read this blog) submitted a rather long comment on the original post on Elders. It is apparent that the reader did some good homework as the comment has several, well, more than several, reference citations. It is clear that they both read the original post and did some Bible study before posting their comment. Because the comment was so long, I thought it appropriate to post another entry rather than bury the response in the comment log. In the following discussion, I have included the text of the comment without the Scripture references. If you want to read the comment in its entirety, scroll to the Elders post and click on the comment. --------------------------------------------------------- [Comment~~~~The church is expected to be a people in exactly this sense. We are the people of God who are charged with continuing and preserving the values, culture, hopes, and the identity of God’s people in our time.~~~~ Does this include th...

Remember You Were Slaves

In his essay "Mishpatim: Healing the Heart of Darkness*," Jonathan Sacks makes the argument that tribalism can, and usually does, give rise to acceptance, compassion, and social bonding but also to fear, hate, and demeaning others. Those in our group give and receive the former from us, those outside our group receive and often give the latter. We humans have the capacity of empathy toward those like us but we also, being finite beings, suffer from fear and that fear too often translates to hate of those not like us.  Sacks then reminds us that Israel was told not to hate the outsider, the one who isn't in our group. He quotes two passages from Exodus: "You must not mistreat or oppress the stranger in any way. Remember, you yourselves were once strangers in the land of Egypt." (22.21) "You must not oppress strangers. You know what it feels like to be a stranger, for you yourselves were once strangers in the land of Egypt." (23.9) Sacks then...