Skip to main content

As Honest as the Pharisees

The parable of the tenants is one I don't remember hearing much as a kid. Maybe that is due to the presence of brutal murder as part and parcel of the story and our general aversion to exposing young children to sex and violence if we can avoid them. As an adult, this parable has usually been explained in the most obvious application, and that having to do with Israel rejecting Jesus, the Son of God. The fallout of that rejection of course, is the taking of the gospel to Gentiles.

So far, so good I suppose. Certainly that is one of the main purposes of the parable. The parable though, doesn't just appear in the text by itself. Rather, it comes as part of a story itself. In this case, Jesus' jousting with the Pharisees. I think it is this story from which we can best use this parable for the church. There are two often left unnoticed statements in the larger story which may have more to say to modern disciples than the actual parable.

The first appears to be the results of rejecting Jesus and this often stated as taking away of the kingdom and giving it to others. But that isn't the whole impact of this aspect of the story. The people who receive the kingdom do not receive it because they are not-Jews, but because they bear fruit. This gives us insight into what God has been after and which Israel was not seeing. The reason the kingdom is taken from Israel is not because they have killed the Son; indeed at this point they have not. The reason is because Israel has not born fruit. They will end up killing the Son but this is because they have neglected the things of the kingdom for some time. In response, the kingdom is made available to those who will produce fruit.

The second aspect, perhaps more often not mentioned is that the Pharisees were honest. Whoa! How can we get that from the story? They have started plotting to kill Jesus but are too afraid to make their plans known. Honest? How is their behavior honest? Simply, they acknowledge that Jesus is talking about them. This is the first step in fixing what needs to be fixed; it is imperative that we understand the message of God is talking to and about us. How many of us read Scripture and simply glide over the parts about "those bad people" without reflecting whether we might be the bad people? Do we read Scripture to let it shine a light into our lives where perhaps there is some shadow, some place we have not inspected, some place that has remained hidden from ourselves?

The question that comes to us is the same faced by the Pharisees. When we realize Jesus is talking about us; when we inspect ourselves in light of the Scripture and find we have been avoiding addressing some fault, or even excusing it, what do we do? What do you do?

It is a somewhat disturbing thought that the Pharisees may have been more honest than we often are. Are we challenged by that possibility to respond more appropriately than the Pharisees? Are we willing to grapple with our own imperfections and failures? 

Are you as honest as the Pharisees?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obedience Rather Than Sacrifice

Saul it seems, was instructed to have the Israelite completely destroy the Amalekites – people and animals. Rather, Saul allowed the Israelites to capture the Amalekite king, and to bring back the choicest live stock. When Samuel returns to visit Saul, the bleating of the sheep and the lowing of the cattle are clearly audible. Assuming that the Israelites had done what had been directed, Samuel finds this noise to be somewhat unexpected, and so he asks Saul to explain what has happened. Saul’s response is a two-parter. The first is that the people have brought back the best of the plunder to sacrifice it to God. The second is that Saul was afraid of the people and so he let them bring back the plunder [and in this explanation, we don’t know why]. Samuel’s response is his mission for God, and he will complete it. Samuel tells Saul that he has failed in his mission to destroy the Amalekites and as a result God has rejected him as king of Israel. In Samuel’s discussion with Saul, he says:

Elders redux

A reader (I am always amazed that people actually read this blog) submitted a rather long comment on the original post on Elders. It is apparent that the reader did some good homework as the comment has several, well, more than several, reference citations. It is clear that they both read the original post and did some Bible study before posting their comment. Because the comment was so long, I thought it appropriate to post another entry rather than bury the response in the comment log. In the following discussion, I have included the text of the comment without the Scripture references. If you want to read the comment in its entirety, scroll to the Elders post and click on the comment. --------------------------------------------------------- [Comment~~~~The church is expected to be a people in exactly this sense. We are the people of God who are charged with continuing and preserving the values, culture, hopes, and the identity of God’s people in our time.~~~~ Does this include th

Naaman's Dipping and Requests

The familiar story of Naaman dipping in the Jordan is a story with more than a few twists. Let's review the story first. Naaman we are told had been used by YHWH to punish Israel and our story describes him as a man of valor in high regard by his boss, the King of Syria the current thorn in the side of Israel. It turns out though that Naaman suffers from some sort of leprosy.  On one of Syria's raids into Israel, the Syrians captured an Jewish girl who had found her way into Naaman's household as a servant for his wife. Knowing of Naaman's illness, she suggests to her matron that there is a prophet in Israel who could help him. This message gets transmitted to Naaman who takes it to his boss. The boss - the king of Syria, tells Naaman to travel to Israel and gives him a letter to Israel's king directing that Naaman be healed. Upon Naaman's arrival in Israel he gives the letter to Israel's king who reacts in a panic. He does not even consider finding t